Identification
#1
Posted 21 July 2009 - 06:35 PM
The reason I ask is that a PCSO can only exercise their duties and powers of their office whilst on duty and in uniform, which is different to a police officer. Yet to my understanding a Police Officer must show identification if asked including when in uniform... if this is also true of a PCSO then I would assume they carried some sort of police identification such as a warrant card.
Do PCSOs carry identification similar to a warrant card?
#2
Posted 21 July 2009 - 06:44 PM
#3
Posted 21 July 2009 - 06:44 PM
to go with it normally attached to the holder itself like the WC is the metal force crest, of which the PCSO is employed,
to the untranined eye it could be passed off as a warrant card, as many people dont even know what one looks like, but that wouldn't do the PCSO any favors
#4
Posted 21 July 2009 - 06:58 PM
#5
Posted 21 July 2009 - 07:44 PM
#6
Posted 23 July 2009 - 12:33 PM
In terms of when they should show it, in reality they should always show it when asked except in extreme circumstances (eg if someones detained on the floor), although I'm not sure if there's any legal requirement for this.
#7
Posted 03 October 2009 - 12:25 AM
#8
Posted 26 October 2009 - 07:46 PM
#9
Posted 30 May 2012 - 09:20 PM
Is there any legal requirement for the latter statement? Because looking at it I would assume that if a PCSO were not wearing the approved headgear (or even a tie) their powers would be null and void. Surely I'm missing something?
N.B. I know that the uniform requirement doesn't apply to warranted constables.
#10
Posted 30 May 2012 - 09:30 PM
I've noticed that some designation cards advise that the powers listed thereon are only exercisable when the PCSO is on-duty and wearing the uniform "as stated below".
Is there any legal requirement for the latter statement? Because looking at it I would assume that if a PCSO were not wearing the approved headgear (or even a tie) their powers would be null and void. Surely I'm missing something?
N.B. I know that the uniform requirement doesn't apply to warranted constables.
For police officers, some police powers can only be used when you are in uniform such as:
- Administering a breath test
- Issuing a FPN
- Obliging a motor-vehicle to stop
However you only need to wear enough uniform to be recognisable as a police officer (so lack of tie, hat etc. would not be a bar) - so I was told in training.
I would thus imagine that something similar would be the case for PCSOs and their powers.
#11
Posted 30 May 2012 - 11:23 PM
#12
Posted 01 June 2012 - 10:41 PM
#13
Posted 02 June 2012 - 06:47 PM
You have to be in uniform and in your county of work for your PCSO powers to apply.
I know that but if you look closely at some designation cards it implies that the powers are only available if the officer is wearing full uniform.
#14
Posted 03 June 2012 - 11:53 AM
#15
Posted 03 June 2012 - 04:05 PM
Mine states that I have my powers "when on duty". Says nothing about being in uniform.
Legally though you do need to be in uniform to exercise your powers, as others have said. It would defeat the object of PCSOs if they weren't visible to the public.
#16
Posted 03 June 2012 - 08:52 PM
Doesn't state what uniform exactly, would of thought it's more the point that you are identifiable as a PCSO.
#17
Posted 06 June 2012 - 10:58 PM
#18
Posted 07 June 2012 - 01:37 AM
Basically: whether theofficer was in uniform at the time is a matter of fact for a court to decide on a case by case basis. What specifically stands as uniform isn't clear but if the officer can be readily identified from his manner of dress then the threshold has probably been met
I would suggest that would be the most fitting authority to apply to the PCSO question.
#19
Posted 08 June 2012 - 05:26 PM
Certain things are listed as optional where uniform is concerned, such a a hat.
I'm accredited under the Railway Safety Accreditation Scheme and work for a train operating company though, and as such, we obviously have our other railway powers to fall back on, which we can use in plain clothes and not necessarily on duty either, such as reporting for offences under byelaws and other legislation.
#20
Posted 09 June 2012 - 12:54 AM
#21
Posted 09 June 2012 - 07:35 AM
I'm not sure it is though. We are accredited by the BTP and therefore our powers are issued by them and signed off by the Chief Constable, much the same i'd imagine, as a PCSO (Obviously it would be commissioner as opposed to CC in the Met though), given our police powers and responsibilities are much the same.Different kettle of fish I would of thought Stigy.
#22
Posted 15 July 2012 - 05:45 AM
#23
Posted 16 July 2012 - 04:17 PM
I'm not sure it is though. We are accredited by the BTP and therefore our powers are issued by them and signed off by the Chief Constable, much the same i'd imagine, as a PCSO (Obviously it would be commissioner as opposed to CC in the Met though), given our police powers and responsibilities are much the same.
Out of interest, do you have to be in uniform (as a railway employee/TOC employee) to exercise bylaw powers?
#24
Posted 16 July 2012 - 04:41 PM
Out of interest, do you have to be in uniform (as a railway employee/TOC employee) to exercise bylaw powers?
No.
#25
Posted 18 July 2012 - 05:22 PM
Out of interest, do you have to be in uniform (as a railway employee/TOC employee) to exercise bylaw powers?
Nope, as I said
I'm an Accredited Person, and we have to be in uniform to exercise any accredited powers. It states this on our "powers cards" which I assume are much the same as designation cards?
Certain things are listed as optional where uniform is concerned, such a a hat.
I'm accredited under the Railway Safety Accreditation Scheme and work for a train operating company though, and as such, we obviously have our other railway powers to fall back on, which we can use in plain clothes and not necessarily on duty either, such as reporting for offences under byelaws and other legislation.
0 user(s) are browsing this forum
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






















