Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Assault


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 specialconstable1

specialconstable1

    Learning the Ropes

  • Members
  • 191 posts
  • Karma

Posted 22 August 2012 - 10:56 PM

Does chucking water over someone constitute an assault?

#2 General Purpose

General Purpose

    Die Hard

  • Members
  • 1,340 posts

Posted 22 August 2012 - 11:00 PM

If you didn't give them permission and they intended to do it.

"A person is guilty of an offence if he causes another to apprehend immediate and unlawful person violence."

#3 caveat_civis

caveat_civis

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • 1,114 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 12:08 AM

"A person is guilty of an offence if he causes another to apprehend immediate and unlawful person violence."


Quick question - where does that quote come from? I thought assault was a common law offence rather than being written in statute?

#4 Obsidian_Eclipse

Obsidian_Eclipse

    Supreme Poster

  • Members
  • 2,773 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 08:39 AM

Quick question - where does that quote come from? I thought assault was a common law offence rather than being written in statute?


Would it be caselaw?..

#5 Special Dibble

Special Dibble

    Learning the Ropes

  • Members
  • 169 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 08:45 AM

criminal damage?

#6 i-plod

i-plod

    Trooper

  • Power Users
  • 910 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 08:58 AM

If you didn't give them permission and they intended to do it.

"A person is guilty of an offence if he causes another to apprehend immediate and unlawful person violence."


GP here is quoting meaning of common assault - Summary offence.

I don't think Criminal Damage would stick obviously depending on the circs. If it was just water then I think it would be difficult to prove the intent (if they denied it) to damage their clothing or if they considered it might damage it etc. If it was dye or paint that would be easier to prove.

#7 andituk

andituk

    Forum Fixture

  • Power Users
  • 1,119 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 10:01 AM

Quick question - where does that quote come from? I thought assault was a common law offence rather than being written in statute?


Whilst I believe that assault is against common law, the offences of "Common Assault" and "Battery" are defined by s39 Criminal Justice act 1988.

#8 Fry

Fry

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Members
  • 8,969 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 10:04 AM

Whilst I believe that assault is against common law, the offences of "Common Assault" and "Battery" are defined by s39 Criminal Justice act 1988.


That act just says that assault/battery is/are summary offences.

http://www.legislati...8/33/section/39

The definition comes from caselaw, as far as I remember.

#9 ococircusboy

ococircusboy

    Experienced

  • Members
  • 741 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 10:05 AM

Quick question - where does that quote come from? I thought assault was a common law offence rather than being written in statute?

Beaten to it!

Edited by ococircusboy, 23 August 2012 - 10:06 AM.


#10 i-plod

i-plod

    Trooper

  • Power Users
  • 910 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 10:17 AM

Does anyone have the definition of Battery? I can find all the info on the offence and law but not the actual definition of Battery or what would be considered battery.

#11 andituk

andituk

    Forum Fixture

  • Power Users
  • 1,119 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 10:45 AM

Isn't anything where you actually touch someone battery, and common assault just making them apprehend immediate and unlawful violence?

Although I've already been wrong in this thread already :D

#12 Myky

Myky

    Die Hard

  • Power Users
  • 1,537 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 10:47 AM

Does anyone have the definition of Battery? I can find all the info on the offence and law but not the actual definition of Battery or what would be considered battery.


Battery is the unlawful application of force against another person. Assault is making someone fear it.

so if i snuck up on you from behind and punched you. I would be guilty of battery but not assault as you could not fear the violence.

but if i walked over to you in an aggressive manner then punched you then i would be guilty of assault and battery.

Edited by Myky, 23 August 2012 - 10:52 AM.


#13 i-plod

i-plod

    Trooper

  • Power Users
  • 910 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 11:07 AM

Yes so for throwing water would be Common assault & battery if they where caused to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence.

Wouldn't that also stick for you sneaking up scenario if after you punched the individual they feared further violence...?

#14 Myky

Myky

    Die Hard

  • Power Users
  • 1,537 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 11:14 AM

Yes so for throwing water would be Common assault & battery if they where caused to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence.

Wouldn't that also stick for you sneaking up scenario if after you punched the individual they feared further violence...?


possibly.... take happy slapping for example where they slapped you then ran away. if you punched me then stayed being aggressive then yes.

#15 i-plod

i-plod

    Trooper

  • Power Users
  • 910 posts

Posted 23 August 2012 - 11:16 AM

Yeah I agree if they run away then there cant be any fear of violence and if you didn't know it was going to happen you were not already in feat of it etc.

#16 richr

richr

    Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,845 posts

Posted 24 August 2012 - 11:18 PM

CPS guidance (which is surprisingly readable!)

#17 Rob90

Rob90

    Forum Regular

  • Power Users+
  • 547 posts

Posted 24 August 2012 - 11:47 PM

Quick question - where does that quote come from? I thought assault was a common law offence rather than being written in statute?


There are various cases which in which the courts have enumerated upon what shall constitute an assault, my personal favourite is that of Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1969] 1 Q.B. 439

An assault is any act which intentionally - or possibly recklessly - causes another person to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence.

Per James J at 444

Edited by Rob90, 24 August 2012 - 11:48 PM.


#18 P3DRO

P3DRO

    Forum Regular

  • Power Users
  • 558 posts

Posted 28 August 2012 - 04:36 PM

my personal favourite is that of Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1969] 1 Q.B. 439


Ahh fagan, the criminal mastermind of victorian london. Made a nice living after selling on those 'previously owned' hankerchiefs :-D

Back to point though, if there was an assault on someone, could you still try to charge for ABH. My point being there is more than likely going to be a bruise and at worst a red tender area.

Edit: scene; pub brawl / drunken fight but not affray

Edited by Sparkypete, 28 August 2012 - 04:38 PM.


#19 Dean Horton

Dean Horton

    Settling In

  • Members
  • 215 posts

Posted 31 August 2012 - 09:40 AM

Does anyone have the definition of Battery? I can find all the info on the offence and law but not the actual definition of Battery or what would be considered battery.


Battery is where a person intentionally or recklessly applies unlawful force to another person.




0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users