Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Police at Olympic venues told to disguise Walkers Crisps & Ginsters Pasties


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Rocket

Rocket

    PoliceSpecials.com Guru

  • Power Users+
  • 9,737 posts

Posted 19 July 2012 - 11:05 AM

Police guarding the Olympics were told to empty their crisps into plastic bags so they did not inadvertantly advertise brands which aren't sponsoring the games.

Officers who will be patrolling the Games' rowing events at Eton, Berks., were amazed when told by senior officers told them they must not be seen with snacks such as Walker's crisps or Ginsters pasties.

Thames Valley Police insisted that before going to the Olympic events officers, including Royal Protection guards, must empty their snacks into a clear polythene bag.

The top-level instruction, based on guidelines from the Games' London organisers, was designed to protect advertising by the official sponsors including Coca Cola, Cadbury's and McDonalds.

With the games being televised around the world, organising bigwigs have moved to stop any free advertising for firms which haven't forked out millions in sponsorship money.

The London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) sent a directive to all forces involved in the policing of the Games to comply with the order.

It meant that Pc's protecting the millions of spectators expected to watch the events live at venues in and around London will be forced to empty their branded sandwiches, crisps and chocolate bars into unidentifiable packaging.

With just days to go until the opening ceremony of the biggest sporting event in the world, police officers were up in arms over the absurd rule.

A Police Federation member for Thames Valley Police, who are policing all rowing events for the Olympic and Paralypic Games at Dorney Lake, in Eton, Berks., said: "I'd like to see a security guard try to tell a police officer to empty his lunch into clear bags.
"They'd have to be very brave because the answer he'd get would be very short indeed."

A Thames Valley Police spokesman said in a statement: "We are expected to comply with LOCOG requirements and therefore are not expected to enter the venue with any goods that do not reflect sponsors.

"This position will be briefed to all officers and staff, although operational effectiveness and any response to an incident will always be our priority."

However, after LOCOG was made aware of the strict interpretation of their rules by Thames Valley Police chiefs and the discord of officers, they spoke to the police and issued clarification.

"The revised guidance amounts to a major climbdown by our top brass who have realised they were taking the 'no branding or advertising' rules a tad too literally," said one police officer involved in the Dorney Rowing Lake events.

"It is a victory for commonsense - but if we hadn't kicked up a fuss, they would have had us decanting our crisps and pop into unmarked containers."

A spokesman for LOCOG said that the rule had been put in place to stop unauthorised brands advertising at the Games and not to stop anyone enjoying the event.

The spokesman said: "We wouldn't want to tell people what they can bring into the venues and what they can't.

"There are rules about brands which are aimed around advertising but petty things like food products aren't the target of it.
"The rule is there to stop the advertising of brands who are not authorised Olympic brands."


http://www.telegraph...s.html#sections

#2 pmtts

pmtts

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Members
  • 7,461 posts

Posted 19 July 2012 - 11:15 AM

The true spirit of the Olympics died many years ago. It's a shame the IOC/LOCOG etc are only interested in £££££££££££££££££££

#3 matchoo

matchoo

    Learning the Ropes

  • Members
  • 125 posts

Posted 19 July 2012 - 12:21 PM

Ridiculous. It's not as if you'd expect to see officers wandering around with food or drink anyway. Glad they have seen sense.

#4 ActivistApp

ActivistApp

    Forum Convert

  • Members
  • 497 posts

Posted 19 July 2012 - 12:42 PM

In a similar vein, I would love to see burger king offer a free burger to every soldier called in to shore up G4's shortfall. What a cheap but effective advertising coup that could be.

Edited by ActivistApp, 19 July 2012 - 12:42 PM.


#5 Rocket

Rocket

    PoliceSpecials.com Guru

  • Topic Starter
  • Power Users+
  • 9,737 posts

Posted 19 July 2012 - 12:44 PM

I like your thinking there AA. :prone:

#6 ActivistApp

ActivistApp

    Forum Convert

  • Members
  • 497 posts

Posted 19 July 2012 - 12:55 PM

Have just discussed it with their PR company (cake group), who like the idea and are bouncing it by BK's head office. BK are obliged to stay away from the Olympics per se - but looking after 'our boys' who have lost out on leave might be acceptable.

Edited by ActivistApp, 19 July 2012 - 01:00 PM.


#7 GodAtum

GodAtum

    Die Hard

  • Members
  • 1,259 posts

Posted 19 July 2012 - 01:02 PM

Funny enough I saw the MET outside Park Lane Hilton eating Walkers crisps from their aid doggy bags (they where standing around the van btw).

#8 TROOPER8555

TROOPER8555

    Settling In

  • Members
  • 217 posts

Posted 19 July 2012 - 01:22 PM

oh i am working some of this anti branding it is then

#9 support

support

    Die Hard

  • Members
  • 1,377 posts

Posted 28 July 2012 - 01:08 PM

Amazing, what about MoP's are the police expected to confiscate snacks from the public if not in the correct branded packaging. Honestly does make you wonder.

#10 HazRat

HazRat

    Supreme Poster

  • Members
  • 2,869 posts

Posted 28 July 2012 - 03:02 PM

I'm on Olympic aid, except I'm not forced to suffer operational feeding or snacks. I did go to a Tesco near the Olympic Park this morning and purchase a box of Tinnocks Tea cakes and a packet of Kettle Chips. I then carried them quite openly and recklessly to my vehicle! So far the IOC branding police haven't caught up with me.

#11 ((TheShake))

((TheShake))

    Supreme Poster

  • Power Users
  • 2,785 posts

Posted 28 July 2012 - 03:29 PM

Just crazy. Dumbfounded.

#12 Corbs

Corbs

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Members
  • 5,043 posts

Posted 29 July 2012 - 12:24 AM

Half the people in this thread seem to have only read the headline. They were then told it was fine, TVP just took it a little too literally.

#13 Chewie

Chewie

    PoliceSpecials.com Staff & Wookiee

  • Moderators
  • 7,853 posts

Posted 29 July 2012 - 11:02 AM

Half the people in this thread seem to have only read the headline. They were then told it was fine, TVP just took it a little too literally.

Agree with all the above, especially the highlighted bit - it wasn't the IOC, G4S, or LOCOG that came up with this suggestion, it was TVP's senior officers.




0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users