Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Over half of firefighters are to fat to do their jobs


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 Killicksparker

Killicksparker

    Forum Legend

  • Power Users+
  • 2,423 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 11:43 AM

More than half of firemen may be too fat to do their jobs properly, claim researchers.

Fire Service regulations call for staff to have high levels of physical fitness to cope with potentially dangerous situations. They need to be fit enough to climb stairs in high-rise buildings, carry unconscious victims, pitch heavy ladders and haul bulky equipment. But a body mass index study of 735 firemen by Loughborough University found 53 per cent were overweight and 13 per cent were obese.

The researchers carried out their study after it emerged obesity rates among firemen in the US were soaring, with 80 per cent classed as overweight or obese. In a report on their findings, published in the journal Occupational Medicine, the Loughborough experts said: 'Obesity among firefighters can present a hindrance to operational effectiveness. 'Given the negative implications of obesity for performance, there is a need for further investment in health promotion research and practice.' Previous US research found nearly half of all on-duty deaths among firemen were caused by heart disease. Although US firemen have the same rates of heart disease as the general population, job stress and coping with life-threatening emergencies every day put them at higher risk of a fatal heart attack.

Not only are obesity rates rising in the fire service, the researchers found, but they are already higher than among the general population. And while the popular image of firemen-themed calendars may portray them as toned, heroic hunks, the reality seems to be many are busy fighting the flab. When they first assessed the firefighters, in 2008, they found 11 per cent were obese and 54 per cent were overweight, the latest research shows that three years on things have not improved.

The report stated: 'Obesity among firefighters can present a hindrance to operational effectiveness.
'The proportion of firefighters who are either overweight or obese is lower in this UK sample than that found in US studies. 'But it was higher than that found in the general population. Given the negative implications of obesity for performance, there is a need for further investment in health promotion research and practice.' Previous research in the US has found nearly half of all on-duty deaths among firefighters are caused by heart disease. Although it found they had same rates of heart disease as the general population, the stress of the job and coping with life-threatening emergencies every day put them at higher risk of a fatal heart attack.

Read more: http://www.dailymail...l#ixzz1zqEmkZQI


This really surprised me, I have to say I have never seen a porky fireman, even though most of the ones I see in our area are retained brigade

If this is true (and I emphasise the IF) there is no excuse, as firefighters (the full time ones) have plenty of downtime between shouts to keep fit. I have seen multigyms in fire stations so they even get provided with the means to keep the weight off

#2 bensonby

bensonby

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Power Users
  • 10,237 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 11:52 AM

Surely it's very flawed if it's just done on BMI as there are probably quite a few muscly firemen and very muscly guys are often classed as "obese" by BMI

Edited by bensonby, 06 July 2012 - 12:01 PM.


#3 SBG

SBG

    PoliceSpecials.com Staff & LPDC Chieftain

  • Moderators
  • 15,012 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 11:59 AM

Yes most firefighers I have come across are certainly not what I would call fat, typical daily mail

#4 MrKguy

MrKguy

    Karate Kid

  • Excluded
  • 890 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 12:33 PM

BMI is the worst indicator,

#5 SBG

SBG

    PoliceSpecials.com Staff & LPDC Chieftain

  • Moderators
  • 15,012 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 12:41 PM

Yes it is - but people still continue to use it!

#6 CmdKeen

CmdKeen

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Power Users+
  • 4,328 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 12:42 PM

Do Trumpington not have fitness tests?

There is however an argument for there being a weight based target - on the lines of "the average firefighter can only drag / carry X kilos - if you weigh more than that with equipment on then you're putting yourself and your oppos at risk if you go down"

Edited by CmdKeen, 06 July 2012 - 12:42 PM.


#7 SBG

SBG

    PoliceSpecials.com Staff & LPDC Chieftain

  • Moderators
  • 15,012 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 12:43 PM

Someone told me that they had them once every six months - not sure how true that is

#8 Dave SYP

Dave SYP

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Members
  • 4,740 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 12:54 PM

There is a very FIT female firefighter at my local fire station. :whistle: :saint:

#9 Lord Vader

Lord Vader

    Lord and Master of All I Survey

  • Power Users+
  • 11,966 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 01:15 PM

Ladies and gents, note the source of the story, the good old police hating Daily Mail. They're also a staunch Conservative supporting paper. Looks like they're trying to undermine public faith and confidence in another emergency service.

The Daily Mail is a rag. Treat it with the respect it deserves and either ignore it or eat your chips out of it.

#10 Radman

Radman

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Power Users+
  • 4,193 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:02 PM

Ladies and gents, note the source of the story, the good old police hating Daily Mail. They're also a staunch Conservative supporting paper. Looks like they're trying to undermine public faith and confidence in another emergency service.

The Daily Mail is a rag. Treat it with the respect it deserves and either ignore it or eat your chips out of it.


In other news Vader, didnt you hear G4S is now moving into fire-fighting?

Who'd have thought it!

(joking aside watch this space...)

#11 Dave SYP

Dave SYP

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Members
  • 4,740 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:07 PM

In other news Vader, didnt you hear G4S is now moving into fire-fighting?

Who'd have thought it!

(joking aside watch this space...)

I can see the monopolies commission being quite busy in years to come.

#12 Rocket

Rocket

    PoliceSpecials.com Guru

  • Power Users+
  • 9,603 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:28 PM

Judging by the comments from the readers of the article, most agree that the DM articles are utter balderdash and politically motivated. The 'Best Rated' comment is;

Think everybody is aware how inaccurate BMI is. DM is merely a government propaganda mouthpiece. Looks like the public are being softened up for some more cuts aimed at the fire service. Nurses - Done!! Police - Done!! Teachers - Done!! Doctors - Done!!



#13 Sharpe

Sharpe

    Experienced

  • Members
  • 722 posts

Posted 07 July 2012 - 08:42 AM

I stopped reading when I got to 'BMI'....

#14 MacGregor

MacGregor

    Supreme Poster

  • Power Users
  • 2,804 posts

Posted 07 July 2012 - 05:49 PM

The article doesn't do the study justice (as is so often the case with science stories in the media). It might be helpful to read the study before writing it off!

I've read the paper that was published and it isn't just using BMI as an indicator. It also uses body fat percentage and waist measurements as the authors of the study note (see below) that BMI alone isn't a good indicator.

[...]This suggests that despite a higher prevalence of firefighters classified as overweight, a lower proportion are classified as high risk based on their WC. This highlights the importance of measuring both BMI and WC in populations with higher levels of lean tissue.


Even accounting for the fact that BMI by itself is just a general screening tool, there seem to have been a not so insignificant amount of firefighters who have a relatively high percentage of body fat and a bit of a belly on them.




0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users