Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

Wasting Ambulance Time


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

Poll: Wasting Ambulance Time (104 member(s) have cast votes)

Should the callers be prosecuted

  1. Yes (97 votes [94.17%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 94.17%

  2. No (6 votes [5.83%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.83%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Killicksparker

Killicksparker

    Forum Legend

  • Power Users+
  • 2,433 posts

Posted 19 August 2011 - 07:07 AM

It was the emergency callout every paramedic dreads – a child in danger. As they raced to a house where a five-year-old had gone into cardiac arrest, they feared for the worst ... until they arrived to discover the youngster was actually a cat.

A fast-response car and an ambulance were scrambled at 6.45am after a desperate couple dialled 999 and pleaded with the emergency operator to revive their 'five-year-old'. But when the teams arrived at the home in Ware, Hertfordshire, they found a tearful couple clutching their five year-old pet, which later died.

An ambulance spokesman said the call could have meant the difference between life and death for a genuine patient.

One paramedic said: 'The 999 situation that raises the adrenaline the most is probably being called to a seriously ill child. It's human nature. 'Fast-response cars and ambulances will be driven at the maximum speed for safety to the scene and paramedics will be mentally prepared to offer their immediate professional assistance. You'd certainly be pumped up by it. The paramedics were probably relieved it wasn't a child to start with and then they were absolutely gobsmacked.' 'It was a surreal situation. I've gone to some silly calls, but nothing like this. I can't understand why they didn't try to call a vet. Some people think 999 covers everything.

The bizarre 999 call was received by East of England Ambulance Service on August 10 from a foreign couple. The paramedic said they had been in the country a short time only and may have been confused, adding: 'We get a lot of callers with language barriers. 'We have a translation line we can use but you haven't got time to do that in a potentially critical situation.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail...l#ixzz1VSKCjfXu

Edited by DanielS, 17 June 2012 - 11:15 PM.
Change of font and size for easier reading


#2 Han Solo

Han Solo

    Learning the Ropes

  • Members
  • 167 posts

Posted 19 August 2011 - 07:21 AM

I still get surprised by the number of calls like this that go through the 999 system.

A penalty should be put in place for prank calling, especially if a RRV and ambulance are deployed which could be used in the race to save someones life.

A national advert campaign by the government could be launched, to educate people what 999 is really for, and the consequences of what could happen by tying up vital resources.

This needs to stop before someone loses a battle they could of win with urgent medical assistance.

#3 DeltaFoxtrot

DeltaFoxtrot

    Settling In

  • Members
  • 298 posts

Posted 19 August 2011 - 05:53 PM

Prank callers should have some sort of sentencing......

calling out the Police, Ambulance or Fire Engine just for a laugh is plain wrong as these might be needed elsewhere to save lives.

#4 Gavin

Gavin

    Forum Legend

  • Members
  • 2,393 posts

Posted 19 August 2011 - 06:55 PM

Having worked in the control room for a couple of days a little while ago I was amazed at the amount of 9's calls we get that just shouldn't be 9's calls, someone reporting a lost mobile phone being one of them. I think we should give them one chance and if they do it again it should be an automatic fine.

#5 GreenGerkin

GreenGerkin

    Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 639 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 02:55 PM

Prank callers should have some sort of sentencing......

calling out the Police, Ambulance or Fire Engine just for a laugh is plain wrong as these might be needed elsewhere to save lives.


Yep
People don't seem to realise the consequences.
TVP had a nasty Polac on Thursday as a result of them racing to a call which turned out to be a hoax: http://www.newburyto...articleID=17623

#6 AnthonyB

AnthonyB

    Die Hard

  • Power Users+
  • 1,490 posts

Posted 20 August 2011 - 10:30 PM

Confused my backside!

Name me one country with a public emergency ambulance service that as default is also a veterinary service!

I think the fact that a vet costs them money may have been more to do with it.....

#7 mwe99

mwe99

    Settling In

  • Members
  • 261 posts

Posted 23 August 2011 - 01:15 PM

They'll never threat with a fine or ban (at least not yet) them purely on the basis of if this is advertised it could dissuade some people calling.


Some old people fall out of bed at say 10pm, and won't call an ambulance til 06am as they think we're "busy, other emergencies" to go to so unfortunately as annoying as it is we still have to go :/

#8 rower

rower

    Settling In

  • Members
  • 239 posts

Posted 10 September 2011 - 01:57 PM

Should it be a case of an alternate 999 number for "half emergencies", or where the person doesn't genuinely know if it's an emergency, but where the operator can upgrade it to an emergency if needed? Like someone falling down and breaking their leg in the middle of nowhere - up to the person to get to the A&E and not call an ambulance, or an elderly person doing the same, would they warrant a 999 rather than a more able person?
I know there are non-emergency numbers like 101 or NHS Direct, but what if they take time to answer? I don't know of a non-emergency number for the fire service in case you were to find something untoward, but not urgent, like a lit flare on the ground.

#9 AnthonyB

AnthonyB

    Die Hard

  • Power Users+
  • 1,490 posts

Posted 10 September 2011 - 09:16 PM

NHS Re-direct are as responsible for as many unnecessary 999 ambulance responses as the public sometimes.......

A non emergemcy ambulance number is all very well, but the irresponsible people will still by pass it & go straight to 999

#10 gsdk9

gsdk9

    Forum Convert

  • Power Users+
  • 444 posts

Posted 12 September 2011 - 04:21 AM

We have a charge for that, "misuse of the 911system".

#11 Medic2

Medic2

    Learning the Ropes

  • Members
  • 156 posts
  • Karma

Posted 24 September 2011 - 05:55 PM

for the person who voted no can you explain why? I am just curious why you think they shouldnt? (i am not going to start a rang but just like to know your reason)

#12 ataylor0

ataylor0

    Forum Convert

  • Members
  • 459 posts

Posted 27 September 2011 - 06:55 AM

Yes, of course they should!
Its a no-brainer..

#13 mwe99

mwe99

    Settling In

  • Members
  • 261 posts

Posted 27 September 2011 - 04:06 PM

Even tho I agree they should because I work for them and see the stuff we go to. As soon as you publisise that you'll start fining/prosecuting it will deter the wrong sort of people calling. We already go to 80 year old people who've had chest pain for hours cos they didn't want to disturb us, or people who fell on the floor at 10pm but thought we were closed til 7am so stayed there. It's tricky, although I agree, it could never happen without detering certain social groups from calling us. It's a catch-22 type thing

for the person who voted no can you explain why? I am just curious why you think they shouldnt? (i am not going to start a rang but just like to know your reason)



#14 samt

samt

    Trooper

  • Members
  • 858 posts

Posted 02 October 2011 - 10:21 AM

111 is being introduced as an alternative for non-(health)emergencies.

#15 Damsel

Damsel

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Power Users+
  • 6,356 posts

Posted 02 October 2011 - 03:50 PM

111 is being introduced as an alternative for non-(health)emergencies.

In fairness, that's not a national thing, yet. It's undergoing trials in certain areas. Luton, County Durham & Lincolnshire if I remember rightly.

Everyone else should (for non emergencies) call NHS Direct on 0845 4647

#16 pathca

pathca

    Settling In

  • Members
  • 317 posts

Posted 04 October 2011 - 10:30 AM

NHS Re-direct are as responsible for as many unnecessary 999 ambulance responses as the public sometimes.......

A non emergemcy ambulance number is all very well, but the irresponsible people will still by pass it & go straight to 999


Sorry -1 that meant to plus it, bleddy touch screen phones
Totally agree about NHS direct ,they are so worried about getting it wrong it goes the other way

#17 rower

rower

    Settling In

  • Members
  • 239 posts

Posted 14 October 2011 - 06:26 PM

Sorry -1 that meant to plus it, bleddy touch screen phones
Totally agree about NHS direct ,they are so worried about getting it wrong it goes the other way


A member of my family had that issue with Serco, unfortunately they didn't advise the use of 999, or anything else medical related other than to wait for a doctor's appointment on Monday.

I had an issue at work out of hours with workmen in who were soldering up a water pipe, and set the alarm off. Duly advised them to vacate as soon as possible as they were holding up a radiator to fix, and we waited, and waited for the fire service as we had an automatic alarm, but no-one turned up. I had the number for fire control so I called them and explained the problem, and was told that the alarm monitoring company had rang and told them not to attend as they'd send someone to have a look. I got told to ring 999 to send an appliance, but the chap then said he'd speak to the station (luckily 50 yards from the control room) and they turned up a few minutes later.
20 minutes later the alarm chap turned up having a go at me for being there, so I reported him on the Monday for his way of dealing with an alarm activation.

Had I known i had to ring 999 then I would have done, but as I was unsure I rang control instead, worried that I might have been using valuable resources when I didn't need to worry.

#18 Juliet Sierra

Juliet Sierra

    Die Hard

  • Members
  • 1,548 posts

Posted 04 November 2011 - 02:22 PM

The emergency workers act deals with obstruction this should be expanded to deal with wasting their time also.


js

#19 Prolixia

Prolixia

    Trooper

  • Members
  • 927 posts

Posted 04 November 2011 - 03:00 PM

I know there are non-emergency numbers like 101 or NHS Direct, but what if they take time to answer? I don't know of a non-emergency number for the fire service in case you were to find something untoward, but not urgent, like a lit flare on the ground.


If you're calling NHS Direct or 101 about something that is so incredibly urgent that it literally can't wait a minute or so to get through to someone then you have the wrong number. It's an emergency and you should be dialing 999. If it's not that urgent, then you just have to wait - it means that other people with potentially more urgent problems are being spoken to first.

101 is, as far as I know, handled by the same operators who take 999 calls. 101 calls are simply deprioritised, with any extra capacity directed to them after all the 999 calls have been answered. Therefore the time it takes to get through will depend on the number of people calling 999.

Edited by Prolixia, 04 November 2011 - 03:01 PM.


#20 Zvyezda

Zvyezda

    L Plates

  • Members
  • 34 posts

Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:02 PM

I voted no because I don't think you can just expect that everybody in the country should know how 999 works and that they are using it wrong intentionally. The nation needs educating first before you can introduce prosecution.

#21 Giraffe

Giraffe

    PoliceSpecials.com Staff

  • Moderators
  • 15,914 posts

Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:38 PM

I voted no because I don't think you can just expect that everybody in the country should know how 999 works and that they are using it wrong intentionally. The nation needs educating first before you can introduce prosecution.


Seriously? We spend an absolute fortune on the education of our youngsters in this country. I've taken 999 calls from people doing exactly the same as the article above - one recent call I took was from a hysterical woman screaming 'she's not breathing' before telling me she'd hit her with her car. When I asked how old the patient was she said she didn't know because it was a cat. I mean seriously if these people are that stupid they should be made to pay for any costs incurred as a result of their call.

#22 pmtts

pmtts

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Members
  • 7,406 posts

Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:59 PM

There used to be a very very funny Ambulance forum called the Big White Taxi Service. Sadly it had to go because of certain issues.

The comments on there about wasting ambulance time were unreal, but true!

#23 Judge Dread

Judge Dread

    Forum Convert

  • Members
  • 473 posts

Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:07 PM

A national advert campaign by the government could be launched, to educate people what 999 is really for, and the consequences of what could happen by tying up vital resources.

This needs to stop before someone loses a battle they could of win with urgent medical assistance.


It's a difficult issue.

I've got loads of mates who DON'T call the police when they really should.

Some of them have been victims of robberies, assaults, theft, burglaries, and your garden variety sec 5-3 POA without ever calling the police. Most said "I didn't want to waste their time" or "I didn't know I *could* call them for that".

So if we start telling people not to phone-up more of those people will never report serious crimes!

I think a campaign clarifying what they should call for would be good.

#24 Zvyezda

Zvyezda

    L Plates

  • Members
  • 34 posts

Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:15 PM

Seriously? We spend an absolute fortune on the education of our youngsters in this country. I've taken 999 calls from people doing exactly the same as the article above - one recent call I took was from a hysterical woman screaming 'she's not breathing' before telling me she'd hit her with her car. When I asked how old the patient was she said she didn't know because it was a cat. I mean seriously if these people are that stupid they should be made to pay for any costs incurred as a result of their call.


But not everybody in the country went through the education system here as a youngster. And of those who did, you can't assume that what they've been taught would stick.

I agree with a national advertising campaign as the way forward.

#25 Corbs

Corbs

    Forum Obsessed!

  • Members
  • 4,999 posts

Posted 02 November 2012 - 06:01 PM

It's a difficult issue.

I've got loads of mates who DON'T call the police when they really should.

Some of them have been victims of robberies, assaults, theft, burglaries, and your garden variety sec 5-3 POA without ever calling the police. Most said "I didn't want to waste their time" or "I didn't know I *could* call them for that".

So if we start telling people not to phone-up more of those people will never report serious crimes!

I think a campaign clarifying what they should call for would be good.

I'm with you on this, I think 101 is great for this, even if it is for 999 really at least it'll make people more willing to get in contact with the police.




0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users