Sex. lies and videotape.........
#1
Posted 05 October 2010 - 08:59 AM
I have had issues with a very noisy nightclub at the end on the lane where i live and a friend suggested I film evidence of their behaviour.
Where do i stand?
#2
Posted 05 October 2010 - 09:23 AM
- PoliceSpecials.com is not responsible for any views, opinions or statements expressed on the forum, as the poster of the particular comments assumes full responsibility. No responsibility is taken or should be assumed for any such views, opinions or statements by PoliceSpecials.com.
- PoliceSpecials.com disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability or availability of information or material on this site, including - but not limited to - the documents available in the 'Downloads' area (previously the 'Reference Library'). Please note that comments and advice given here with the best of intentions by the host, moderators or other users of the forum may not be correct, and that any advice given, in particular advice on the law and its application, is no substitute for personal legal advice from a solicitor.
- Therefore any and all information you receive through the forum or via private messages, email etc. is always given on the condition that you 'use it at your own risk'. The host and agents of the forum will not be held responsible for any consequences of the use of such advice. PoliceSpecials.com disclaims any responsibility for any harm resulting from downloading or accessing any information on this site.
There are any number of threads on this topic elsewhere on this forum, use the search function and you'll have all the details and debate in front of you in no time.
Edited by Bouquaine, 05 October 2010 - 09:26 AM.
#3
Posted 05 October 2010 - 09:28 AM
#4
Posted 05 October 2010 - 09:54 AM
edit : Personally I don't see why people just post that disclaimer without also trying to help people out, I thought the police are supposed to be trying to get the public on their side, and general advice would be a good way of doing it.
Edited by gordon, 05 October 2010 - 09:56 AM.
#5
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:02 AM
I thought the police are supposed to be trying to get the public on their side, and general advice would be a good way of doing it.
Because he might not be a Police Officer?
I would make sure if you do decide to record anything, make sure the video displays the date/time of the recording.
You'll need to submit it into the local council.
#6
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:04 AM
Personally I don't see why people just post that disclaimer without also trying to help people out, I thought the police are supposed to be trying to get the public on their side, and general advice would be a good way of doing it.
But I did help him/her out with general advice - and they thanked me.
#7
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:06 AM
I have felt that up to now i've been met with a brick wall when going to my council etc for help, its good to know there are some helpfull people out there!
#8
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:12 AM
Edited by gordon, 05 October 2010 - 10:13 AM.
#9
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:18 AM
It's a gay club and they said many individuals may be "sensitive about being filmed", although no-one objected at the time and I must stress I was most carefull not to "get in anyones face" and just to film the general scene. This was only ever intended to be sent to my local councillors and/or the licensing board.
#10
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:22 AM
I have already taken some videos (just of general scene not of individuals etc) about 5 weeks ago and last night had two policewomen round at my flat to "interview me under caution" as they had received a complaint about my filming - if you can call it that - its just actually my mobile phone, which iis not great quality so you couldnt identify individuals even if you wanted to!
It's a gay club and they said many individuals may be "sensitive about being filmed", although no-one objected at the time and I must stress I was most carefull not to "get in anyones face" and just to film the general scene. This was only ever intended to be sent to my local councillors and/or the licensing board.
Being interviewed under caution doesn't mean you're in trouble or anything.
Personally if it were me I would be trying to avoid being seen taping them because it will just pester them, I know if someone was recording me it would annoy me, it's just about being courteous to the members of the public although there is nothing legally wrong with you videoing in a public place.
Obviously you can submit it to the council and see what they say, remember if you come to a brick wall with them (which happens a lot sadly) you have your local councillors you can speak to about it also.
#11
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:27 AM
Unfortunately I thought if I was open about filming it would seem less devious - lesson learned.
#12
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:30 AM
Thanks again, i will take on board your advice.
Unfortunately I thought if I was open about filming it would seem less devious - lesson learned.
You're right, but I think it makes you stand out more and therefore annoy people more.
I remember I was doing a project for my University and all I was doing was taking pictures of the University campus for a project with an DSLR camera and you should have seen the looks I was getting.
#13
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:42 AM
Thank you for your advice, it is much appreciated.
I have felt that up to now i've been met with a brick wall when going to my council etc for help, its good to know there are some helpfull people out there!
If you look at the amount of time and effort that is invested in policing "the night time
If it is such a persistant problem like you suggest, then there will undoubtedly be other residents in your area who feel the same way. It might be worth contacting them and forming some sort of 'residents group' which will provide a stronger case for action than an individual, or even a number of individuals would.
Ah oops, I missed the actual answer underneath the Disclaimer. Most of the time people seem to post the Disclaimer and then leave. Sorry Bouquaine.
Forgiven.
#14
Posted 05 October 2010 - 11:05 AM
There was previously a nightclub in the same premises which closed in 2004, im lead to believe because of licence infringements and numerous resident complaints. Im told by long term residents that they were given assurances by the councillors at the time that i wouldn't reopen as a club. I moved into the lane in 2007 knowing nothing of the history and the club reopened as of January 2010.
Unfortunately the prevalent attitude is that its always hostorically been a club so tough, if im not happy I can move!
#15
Posted 05 October 2010 - 11:12 AM
That advice which i plan to act on - I do know there are other residents who have been complaining about the anti-social behaviour, so it makes sense that we act together to solve this.
There was previously a nightclub in the same premises which closed in 2004, im lead to believe because of licence infringements and numerous resident complaints. Im told by long term residents that they were given assurances by the councillors at the time that i wouldn't reopen as a club. I moved into the lane in 2007 knowing nothing of the history and the club reopened as of January 2010.
Unfortunately the prevalent attitude is that its always hostorically been a club so tough, if im not happy I can move!
You might deploy the very same argument against them:
"Historically, my residence has always been a residence", even if the resident has changed in the same way as the owner of the club has changed...
Edited by Bouquaine, 05 October 2010 - 11:14 AM.
#16
Posted 05 October 2010 - 11:46 AM
I'd be interested to know why you were being interviewed under caution, what possible offence were you being considered to have committed by filming in public?I have already taken some videos (just of general scene not of individuals etc) about 5 weeks ago and last night had two policewomen round at my flat to "interview me under caution" as they had received a complaint about my filming - if you can call it that - its just actually my mobile phone, which iis not great quality so you couldnt identify individuals even if you wanted to!
It's a gay club and they said many individuals may be "sensitive about being filmed", although no-one objected at the time and I must stress I was most carefull not to "get in anyones face" and just to film the general scene. This was only ever intended to be sent to my local councillors and/or the licensing board.
#17
Posted 05 October 2010 - 12:12 PM
She did say that the club managment were concerned that i may have filmed any trans-gender customers , and their families may not be aware "what they are up to in their private lives" - thats their words not mine.
I can only say that as far as I was aware in filming the general scene they were just ordinary club-goers - their sexuality/religion or any other category has never been of interest to me - I only have an issue with the noise levels in the early hours of the weekend.
It may be worth mentioning that their head of security is a law student......or so he claims......
#19
Posted 05 October 2010 - 12:26 PM
#20
Posted 05 October 2010 - 12:30 PM
#21
Posted 05 October 2010 - 12:30 PM
#22
Posted 05 October 2010 - 12:42 PM
What times did i record at?
What did i use to get the videos?
Why did I do it?
What did I intend doing with the videos?
Did I incite anyone to make a disturbance while i was filming?
And how would I feel about being video taped?
#23
Posted 05 October 2010 - 01:03 PM
>Name
>Address
>Date of birth
>Place of birth
>Nationality
#24
Posted 05 October 2010 - 01:13 PM
I didn't mention that as i thought that would just be standard questions.
Im stil a bit confused as to who they would consider to be a suspect or potential witness..........and how that exactly fits in with my situation.
#25
Posted 05 October 2010 - 01:16 PM
It would probably make them a lot more exact on the questions they asked.
0 user(s) are browsing this forum
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





















