MPotter

Resident Members
  • Content count

    251
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About MPotter

  • Rank
    Training

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

486 profile views
  1. What would YOU do?

    Agreed. My point is that the MOP would not have committed the offence of Obstruct PC. Therefore he can not be arrested for that offence. He should instead be arrested for the offence suspected. If he is later suspected of Obstruct PC he can be further arrested for and charged with that offence.
  2. What would YOU do?

    Agreed. Therefore that offence can be arrested for so there is no need to arrest for Obstruct Police.
  3. What would YOU do?

    In which case why arrest for obstructing Police (I doubt that such an arrest would be lawful) when you could arrest for the RTA offence commited by refusing to comply with the s164 requirement? Also I fail to see how simply refsuing to answer questions is obstructing Police.
  4. Fake underage bet

    Mr Marston picks a random person's name, Mr Smith, out of the phone book and proceeds to create a fake Twitter account in their name. Using this account, he tweets a random bookmakers (William Hill) to say that his underage son has accidentally placed a large bet (which lost) on a far-right foreign politician winning the general election and asks for a refund. William Hill do not respond so Mr Marston takes to tweeting a number of other people such as Mr Turner about the underage bet. Mr Marston then sells his story to a number of newspapers, making quite a substantial sum. Mr Smith notices the article in one of these papers and being quite happy decides to telephone the Police. He complains that the articles and Tweets have caused him, alarm, distress, harassment and anxiety and you are the officer tasked with dealing with his call? What do you do?
  5. What would YOU do?

    How do his actions constitute Obstructing Police? According to Rice v Connolly a man or woman is not obliged to give his/her name and address unless under a specific legal obligation to do so!
  6. Fake bet scandal

    Mr Marston picks a random person's name, Mr Smith, out of the phone book and proceeds to create a fake Twitter account in their name. Using this account, he tweets a random bookmakers (William Hill) to say that his underage son has accidentally placed a large bet (which lost) on a far-right foreign politician winning the general election and asks for a refund. William Hill do not respond so Mr Marston takes to tweeting a number of other people such as Mr Turner about the underage bet. Mr Marston then sells his story to a number of newspapers, making quite a substantial sum. Mr Smith notices the article in one of these papers and being quite happy decides to telephone the Police. He complains that the articles and Tweets have caused him, alarm, distress, harassment and anxiety.
  7. FMOTL and such

    I don't see how my videos are relevant.
  8. Forgotten items

    IMO it's the same thing, there isn't a stronger duty on the homeowner. I believe that there does need to be dishonesty at the time of the commission of the offence or it is not committed.
  9. Wiki administrator

    You get a call from a wiki administrator to report a persistent ban evader. Are there any offences and if so what action do you take?
  10. FMOTL and such

    You may well be wrong when you say that, although the Queen cannot prosecute herself could she not be privately prosecuted?
  11. FMOTL and such

    Back to the topic, once I tried some FMOTL antics on a copper to see what reaction I would get. He said "I'm a freeman on the land, I don't understand what you're saying.". Also in Canada a Mr Meads tried to defend a civil case with an FMOTL argument in the case Meads vs Meads. he lost!
  12. FMOTL and such

    I presume that he didn't consent to a lift unless it was given by a constable acting on oath?
  13. FMOTL and such

    If I were a Police officer I wouldn't do that, the reason being that this would risk alienating the FMOTL from myself and/or maybe getting asked some questions back. Instead I would ignore their claims and get on with the job in hand! If they are charged with an offence then they are more than welcome to argue their position in court.
  14. FMOTL and such

    I'm seriously surprised that Police forces don't have procedures on dealing with freemen on the land. I know that courts do!
  15. i said what?

    I'd say that if the kid said "I didn't get consent" they are guilty of TWOC. Even if they subsequently say "but if I'd asked my parent would have let me" because it's only a hypothetical scenario!